Approach-avoidance conflicts occur when there is one goal or event that has both positive and negative effects or characteristics that make the goal appealing and unappealing simultaneously. For example, marriage is a momentous decision that has both positive and negative aspects.
What is double approach conflict?
In real life, the individual frequently is faced with having to choose between two (or more) goals, each of which has both attracting and repelling aspects. Since the tendency is to approach and avoid each of the goals, this pattern is called double approach-avoidance.
The sleeper effect is a psychological phenomenon that relates to persuasion. It is a delayed increase of the effect of a message that is accompanied by a discounting cue.
The peripheral route to persuasion occurs when the listener decides whether to agree with the message based on other cues besides the strength of the arguments or ideas in the message. For example, a listener may decide to agree with a message because the source appears to be an expert, or is attractive.
Peripheral Route Processing. Peripheral Route Processing (also known as Peripheral Route To Persuasion) occurs when someone evaluates a message, such as an advertisement, on the basis of physical attractiveness, background music, or other surface-level characteristics rather than the actual content of the message.
persuasive communication that presents two points of view and then presents arguments to counter the opposing view; also called two-sided appeal. A two-sided message is more appropriate to an audience that is favorably disposed toward the opposing view or is likely to be exposed to strong arguments for the other side.
.One-sided messages: "A message that presents only those arguments in favor of a particular position." .Two-sided messages: "A message that that presents the arguments in favor of a proposition but also considers the opposing arguments." One sided messages. -Solely presents one side of an argument, product, or issue.
Dialogic argument. Definition: has a much stronger component of inquiry, in which the writer presents himself as uncertain or searching, the audience is considered a partner in the dialogue, and the writer's purpose is to seek common ground perhaps leading to a consensual solution to a problem.
It must clearly signal the writer's specific position on the issue and/or the direction of her/his argument. Usually a classical argument has a written thesis statement early in the paper—usually in the first paragraph or two.
A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted. It may not even make the argument unsound.
The Toulmin method is an informal method of reasoning. Created by the British philosopher Stephen Toulmin it involves the grounds (data), claim, and warrant of an argument. These three parts of the argument are all necessary to support a good argument.
A tone argument is an argument used in discussions, sometimes by concern trolls and sometimes as a derailment tactic, where it is suggested that feminists would be more successful if only they expressed themselves in a more pleasant tone.
Persuasive writing often takes the form of an argumentative essay: you first construct a thesis, then justify it with compelling evidence. As the writer you assume a tone--an attitude toward your subject and audience--that persuades the reader you are a credible essayist.
A premise is a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. There can be one or many premises in a single argument. A conclusion is a statement in an argument that indicates of what the arguer is trying to convince the reader/listener.
A good argument is an argument that is either valid or strong, and with plausible premises that are true, do not beg the question, and are relevant to the conclusion. Now that you know what a good argument is, you should be able to explain why these claims are mistaken.
In logic: Scope and basic concepts. …new proposition, usually called the conclusion. A rule of inference is said to be truth-preserving if the conclusion derived from the application of the rule is true whenever the premises are true.
Premise Indicators Conclusion Indicators. Page 1. Argument: Two or more declarative sentences/propositions, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide reasons to believe, (or support for), one of the other propositions (the conclusion).
A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the arguer to be deductively valid, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion provided that the argument's premises are true.
A successful deductive argument has true premises and a valid structure. A simple form, called Modus Ponens, involves one premise which establishes an "if . . . then" relationship between two claims and then, a second premise, which asserts the claim in the "if" clause of the first premise.
An inductive argument is an argument in which it is thought that the premises proVide reasons supporting the probable truth of the conclusion. In an inductive argument, the premises are intended only to be so strong that, if they are true, then it is unlikely that the conclusion is false.
Definition: Conflict whereby one must choose between two desirable or attractive goals. Example: An example of an approach-approach conflict would be where you have to decide between two appealing destinations for your vacation, for example, Mexico vs. the Caribbean.